Back

Recursive Cleaning for Large-scale Protein Data via Multimodal Learning

Jiang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, S.; Fang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Qing, R.; Xu, R.

2024-10-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.10.08.617190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWReliable datasets and high-performance models work together to drive significant advancements in protein representation learning in the era of Artificial Intelligence. The size of protein models and datasets has grown exponentially in recent years. However, the quality of protein knowledge and model training has suffered from the lack of accurate and efficient data annotation and cleaning methods. To address this challenge, we introduce ProtAC, which corrects large Protein datasets with a scalable Automatic Cleaning framework that leverages both sequence and functional information through multimodal learning. To fulfill data cleaning, we propose the Sequence-Annotation Matching (SAM) module in the model, which filters the functional annotations that are more suitable for the corresponding sequences. Our approach is a cyclic process consisting of three stages: first pretraining the model on a large noisy dataset, then finetuning the model on a small manually annotated dataset, and finally cleaning the noisy dataset using the finetuned model. Through multiple rounds of "train-finetune-clean" cycles, we observe progressive improvement in protein function prediction and sequenceannotation matching. As a result, we achieve (1) a state-of-the-art (SOTA) model that outperforms competitors with fewer than 100M parameters, evaluated on multiple function-related downstream tasks, and (2) a cleaned UniRef50 dataset containing [~]50M proteins with well-annotated functions. Performing extensive biological analysis on a cleaned protein dataset, we demonstrate that our model is able to understand the relationships between different functional annotations in proteins and that proposed functional annotation revisions are reasonable.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.