RELEASE: REdressing Long-tErm Antidepressant uSE in adults in general practice (RELEASE): A two arm parallel-group cluster RCT effectiveness-implementation hybrid type-1 study
Wallis, K. A.; Donald, M.; WARE, R. S.
Show abstract
The REdressing Long-tErm Antidepressant uSE in general practice (RELEASE) trial is a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) that seeks to determine whether a novel multi-strategy intervention that supports safe cessation of long-term antidepressants is superior to Usual Care.1 Pragmatic trials are designed to determine how well interventions work in clinical practice under everyday conditions.2 The multi-strategy intervention has two forms, known as RELEASE and RELEASE+. RELEASE for patients includes direct patient education and resources3 and an invitation to medication review; RELEASE for general practitioners (GPs) includes education, training in the brief intervention (Ask, Advise, Assist) and printable resources via practice management software. RELEASE+ additionally includes for patients links to freely available information online via an App, and for GPs clinical audit and feedback on practice prescribing of antidepressants. Patient directed education material has the potential to support safer prescribing, including in this case improved recognition and management of antidepressant withdrawal symptoms.4, 5 Brief interventions have the potential to change GP prescribing behaviour.6 The primary comparison of interest is whether any RELEASE intervention is superior to Usual Care. A secondary comparison will be between the two types of RELEASE interventions (RELEASE and RELEASE+). The purpose of this document is to minimise bias and ensure transparency and internal validity for the findings of the trial, by defining and making publicly available the analysis approach prior to reviewing or analysing trial data. The statistical analysis plan (SAP) will inform analysis and reporting of the main effectiveness findings of the trial. It provides a detailed description of the primary and secondary trial outcomes and the methods for statistical comparison.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Antidepressant Advisor (ADeSS): A Decision Support System for Antidepressant Treatment for Depression in UK primary care – a feasibility study 97%
- Side effect profile and comparative tolerability of newer generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis 96%
- Global prevalence of antidepressant utilization in the community: A protocol for a systematic review 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting intentions towards long-term antidepressant use in the management of people with depression in primary care: A longitudinal survey study 96%
- On the treatment effect heterogeneity of antidepressants in major depression. A Bayesian meta-analysis 95%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 92%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 93%
- Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020) 92%
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Under detection of depression in primary care settings in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Repurposing Existing Medications for Coronavirus Disease 2019: Protocol for a Rapid and Living Systematic Review 91%
- Understanding the Challenges of Medicine Optimisation Among Older People From Ethnic Minority Communities (Aged 60 Years and Above) With Polypharmacy in Primary Care: A Realist Review Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.