Back

FungAMR: A comprehensive portrait of antimicrobial resistance mutations in fungi

Bedard, C.; Pageau, A.; Fijarczyk, A.; Mendoza-Salido, D.; Alcaniz, A.; Despres, P.; Durand, R.; Plante, S.; Alexander, E.; Rouleau, F.; Giguere, M.; Bernier, M.; Sharma, J.; Maroc, L.; Gervais, N.; Menon, A.; Gagnon-Arsenault, I.; Bakker, S.; Rhodes, J.; Dufresne, P.; Bharat, A.; Sellam, A.; De Luca, D.; Gerstein, A.; Shapiro, R.; Quijada, N.; Landry, C.

2024-10-07 microbiology
10.1101/2024.10.07.617009 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat. To optimize the use of our antifungal arsenal, we need rapid detection and monitoring tools that rely on high-quality AMR mutation data. Here, we performed a thorough manual curation of published AMR mutations in fungal pathogens to produce the FungAMR reference dataset. A total of 501 papers were curated, leading to 35,792 mutation entries all classified with the degree of evidence that supports their role in resistance. FungAMR covers 95 species, 246 genes and 208 drugs. We combined variant effect predictors with FungAMR resistance mutations and showed that these tools could be used to help predict the potential impact of mutations on AMR. Additionally, a comparative analysis among species revealed a high level of convergence in the molecular basis of resistance, highlighting some potentially universal resistance mutations. The analysis also showed that a significant number of resistance mutations lead to cross-resistance within antifungals of a class, as well as between classes for certain mutated genes. The acquisition of fungal resistance in the clinic and the field is an urging concern. Finally, we provide a computational tool, ChroQueTas, that leverages FungAMR to screen fungal genomes for AMR mutations. These resources are anticipated to have great utility for researchers in the fight against antifungal resistance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.