Back

Postglacial Genetic Legacies, Demography, and Climate Change: Setting Conservation Priorities for Silver Fir

Balao, F.; Rios, M.; Sanchez-Robles, J. M.; Lorenzo, M. T.; Linares, J. C.; Terrab, A.

2024-10-11 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.10.07.616973 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimClimate change challenges the adaptive capacity of several tree species. This study explores the genetic diversity and past range dynamics of silver fir (Abies alba) with the objective of set hotspots of population diversity and priorities for conservation based on climate change-induced dieback. LocationMediterranean, Europe MethodsWe perform genome-wide analysis by RAD-seq to range-wide 26 A. alba populations. ResultsWe identified two lineages in the southern range, formed by populations from the Apennine chain, from the west side, and those from the Balkans and Carpathians, from the east side. Northern range populations showed two lineages, with definite genetic differences between the westernmost populations from those from the eastern. Populations from the Northern Balkans and the NE Apennine were situated in the intermediate positions. Regarding demographics, southern populations remained stable as glacial refuges, while northern populations experienced a population decline during the middle Pleistocene due to glaciations. Although the demographic events that shaped the current spatial structure of genetic diversity of silver fir go back to the Pleistocene, human pressure during the Holocene likely led to an abrupt range decline, while recent drought events have caused widespread dieback. Main ConclusionsWe provide a generic framework for setting silver fir conservation priorities based on the phylogeographical lineages and current dieback symptoms induced by climate change. Our results support that rear edge populations might be disproportionately important for the adaptive capacity of silver fir under a climate change scenario.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.