Back

Unlocking the potential of wearable device wear time to enhance postpartum depression screening and detection

Hurwitz, E.; Meltzer-Brody, S.; Butzin-Dozier, Z.; Patel, R. C.; Elhadad, N.; Haendel, M. A.

2024-10-07 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2024.10.07.24315026 medRxiv
Show abstract

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a mood disorder affecting one in seven women after childbirth that is often under-screened and under-detected. If not diagnosed and treated, PPD is associated with long-term developmental challenges in the child and maternal morbidity. Wearable technologies, such as smartwatches and fitness trackers (e.g., Fitbit), offer continuous and longitudinal digital phenotyping for mood disorder diagnosis and monitoring, with device wear time being an important yet understudied aspect. Using the All of Us Research Program (AoURP) dataset, we assessed the percentage of days women with PPD wore Fitbit devices across pre-pregnancy, pregnancy, postpartum, and PPD periods, as determined by electronic health records. Wear time was compared in women with and without PPD using linear regression models. Results showed a strong trend that women in the PPD cohort wore their Fitbits more those without PPD during the postpartum (PPD: mean=72.9%, SE=13.8%; non-PPD: mean=58.9%, SE=12.2%, P-value=0.09) and PPD time periods (PPD: mean=70.7%, SE=14.5%; non-PPD: mean=55.6%, SE=12.9%, P-value=0.08). We hypothesize this may be attributed to hypervigilance, given the common co-occurrence of anxiety symptoms among women with PPD. Future studies should assess the link between PPD, hypervigilance, and wear time patterns. We envision that device wear patterns with digital biomarkers like sleep and physical activity could enhance early PPD detection using machine learning by alerting clinicians to potential concerns facilitating timely screenings, which may have implications for other mental health disorders.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.