Back

Validating the genus Pocheina (Acrasidae, Heterolobosea, Excavata) leads to the recognition of three major lineages within Acrasidae

Tice, A. K.; Regis, K.; SHUTT, T.; Spiegel, F. W.; Brown, M. W.; Silberman, J. D.

2024-10-06 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.10.05.616810 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pocheina and Acrasis are two genera of heterolobosean sorocarpic amoebae within Acrasidae that have historically been considered close relatives. The two genera were differentiated based on their differing fruiting body morphologies. The validity of this taxonomic distinction was challenged when a SSU rRNA phylogenetic study placed an isolate morphologically identified as Pocheina rosea within a clade of Acrasis rosea isolates. The authors speculated that pocheinoid fruiting body morphology might be the result of aberrant A. rosea fruiting body development, which if true, would nullify this taxonomic distinction between genera. To clarify Acrasidae systematics, we analyzed SSU rRNA and ITS region sequences from multiple isolates of Pocheina, Acrasis, and Allovahlkampfia generated by PCR and transcriptomics. We demonstrate that the initial SSU sequence attributed to P. rosea originated from an A. rosea DNA contamination in its amplification reaction. Our analyses, based on morphology, SSU and 5.8S rRNA genes phylogenies, as well as comparative analyses of ITS1 and ITS2 sequences, resolve Acrasidae into three major lineages; Allovahlkampfia and the strongly supported clades comprising Pocheina and Acrasis. We confirm that the latter two genera can be identified by their fruiting body morphologies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
5
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
8
Systematic Entomology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
11
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
12
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
16
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Journal of Phycology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
22
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
30
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%