Back

Uncovering large effect loci and epistasis for lifespan in standing genetic variation in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster

van den Heuvel, J.; Zandveld, J.; Vrieling, K.; Pannebakker, B. A.; Kammenga, J.; Zwaan, B.

2024-10-05 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.10.05.616769 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lifespan is a heritable trait with a polygenic architecture. Experimental evolution in combination with re-sequencing has often been used to identify candidate loci for lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster. Previous experiments showed that Drosophila populations experimentally evolved to increase late-life reproduction showed a correlated responses in development time, body size, but also lifespan. Subsequent whole genome sequencing allowed for the identification of candidate loci that correlated to lifespan differentiation. However, it remains difficult to assess whether candidate loci affect lifespan and to what extent such loci pleiotropically underpin multiple traits. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that lifespan effects of loci are often context dependent, but genotype-by-genotype interactions remain understudied. Therefore, here, we report on a study where we genotyped 3210 individuals for 32 candidate loci that emerged from our evolve and re-sequence experiment and tested, (1) whether these loci significantly affected lifespan, (2) the effect size of each locus, and, (3) how these loci mutually interact, i.e. determine the level of epistasis in moulding lifespan. Of the 32 loci, six showed significant main effect associations, of which three loci showed effects of 6.6 days difference in lifespan or larger, while the overall average lifespan was 41.7 days. Eight additional significant pairwise interactions between loci were found, of which four (single) main effects and one three-way interaction was significant. Lastly, we found that alleles that increased lifespan did not necessarily have higher frequencies in populations that showed increased lifespan, indicating that lifespan itself had not been the major target of selection. Our study indicates that individual genotyping following an evolve and re-sequencing study is essential to understand the mechanistic basis of polygenetic adaptation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.4%
2
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
14.0%
3
Heredity
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
5
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
14
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
18
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
24
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%