Back

The brain's "dark energy" puzzle upgraded: FDG uptake, delivery and phosphorylation, and their coupling with resting-state brain activity

Volpi, T.; Lee, J. J.; Vlassenko, A. G.; Goyal, M. S.; Corbetta, M.; Bertoldo, A.

2024-10-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.05.615717 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brains resting-state energy consumption is expected to be mainly driven by spontaneous activity. In our previous work, we extracted a wide range of features from resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), and used them to predict [18F]FDG PET SUVR as a proxy of glucose metabolism. Here, we expanded upon our previous effort by estimating [18F]FDG kinetic parameters according to Sokoloffs model, i.e., Ki (irreversible uptake rate), K1 (delivery), k3 (phosphorylation), in a large healthy control group. The parameters spatial distribution was described at a high spatial resolution. We showed that while K1 is the least redundant, there are relevant differences between Ki and k3 (occipital cortices, cerebellum and thalamus). Using multilevel modeling, we investigated how much of the regional variability of [18F]FDG parameters could be explained by a combination of rs-fMRI variables only, or with the addition of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO2), estimated from 15O PET data. We found that combining rs-fMRI and CMRO2 led to satisfactory prediction of individual Ki variance (45%). Although more difficult to describe, Ki and k3 were both most sensitive to local rs-fMRI variables, while K1 was sensitive to CMRO2. This work represents the most comprehensive assessment to date of the complex functional and metabolic underpinnings of brain glucose consumption.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.