Back

pLM-DBPs: Enhanced DNA-Binding Protein Prediction in Plants Using Embeddings From Protein Language Models

Pokharel, S.; Barasa, K.; Pratyush, P.; KC, D. B.

2024-10-06 bioinformatics
10.1101/2024.10.04.616755 bioRxiv
Show abstract

DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) play critical roles in gene regulation, development, and environmental response across various species, including plants, animals, and microorganisms. While various machine learning and deep learning models have been developed to distinguish DNA-binding proteins (DBPs) from non-DNA-binding proteins (NDBPs), most available tools have focused on human and mouse datasets. As a result, there are limited studies specifically addressing plant-based DNA-binding proteins, which restricts our understanding of their unique roles and functions in plant biology. Developing an efficient framework for improving DBP prediction in plants would enhance our knowledge and enable precise gene expression control, accelerate crop improvement, enhance stress resilience, and optimize metabolic engineering for agricultural advancement. In this work, we developed a tool that uses a protein language model (pLM) pre-trained on millions of sequences. We evaluated several leading models, including ProtT5, Ankh, and ESM-2, and leveraged their high-dimensional, information-rich representations to improve the accuracy of DNA-binding protein prediction in plants significantly. Our final model, pLM-DBPs, a feed-forward neural network classifier utilizing ProtT5-based representations, outperformed existing approaches with a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 83.8% on the independent test set. This represents a 10% improvement over the previous state-of-the-art model for plant-based DBP prediction, highlighting its superior performance compared to the existing approaches.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.