Back

Microbicidal Mechanisms for Light-Activated Molecular Nanomachines in Mycobacterium smegmatis: A Model for Pathogenic Bacteria

Galbadage, T.; Liu, D.; Tour, J. M.; Cirillo, J. D.; Gunasekera, R. S.

2024-10-06 microbiology
10.1101/2024.10.04.616754 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is a global health crisis of antimicrobial resistance, with over a million deaths annually attributed to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, and mycobacterial infections are a major cause of antimicrobial-resistant infections, leading to more deaths than any other single infectious agent. Notably, the rise of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and totally drug-resistant (TDR) strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis led to higher mortality rates and challenge all existing antibiotic regimens. Light-activated molecular nanomachines (MNMs) represent a promising class of broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents that could help counter this rise in antimicrobial resistance. Addressing a key knowledge gap, this study explores the mechanisms of action for MNMs in Mycobacterium smegmatis, a surrogate model for pathogenic mycobacteria. We show that fast rotor MNMs kill up to 97% of M. smegmatis and co-localize with the bacteria as part of their mechanism of action. The ability to translate these observations to pathogenic mycobacteria was demonstrated by the ability of MNMs to kill 93.5% of M. tuberculosis under similar conditions. These findings suggest that MNMs may provide innovative sustainable antimicrobial agents for the treatment of drug-resistant mycobacterial infections. Graphical AbstractBacteria exposed to MNMs have two distinct outcomes when activated by 365 nm light. Slow motors (MNM 2 and 4) have no rotational action, remains outside the bacteria and have little to no effect on bacterial viability. Whereas fast motors (MNM 1 and 3) co-localize and embed into the bacterial cell wall causing disruptions that lead to a significant reduction in bacterial viability. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=89 SRC="FIGDIR/small/616754v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@70991corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@541a36org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18504bcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1fa08c3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.