Back

Continuous lesion images drive more accurate predictions of outcomes after stroke than binary lesion images

Hope, T. M. H.; Neville, D.; Seghier, M. L.; Price, C. J.

2024-10-07 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.04.616726 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current medicine cannot confidently predict who will recover from post-stroke impairments. Researchers have sought to bridge this gap by treating the post-stroke prognostic problem as a machine learning problem. Consistent with the observation that these impairments are caused by the brain damage that stroke survivors suffer, information concerning where and how much lesion damage they have suffered conveys useful prognostic information for these models. Much recent research has considered how best to encode this lesion information, to maximise its prognostic value. Here, we consider an encoding that, while not novel, has never before been formally examined in this context: continuous lesion images, which encode continuous evidence for the presence of a lesion, both within and beyond what might otherwise be considered the boundary of a binary lesion image. Current state of the art models employ information derived from binary lesion images. Here, we show that those models are significantly improved (i.e., with smaller Mean Squared Error between predicted and empirical outcome scores) when using continuous lesion images to predict a wide range of cognitive and language outcomes from a very large sample of stroke patients. We use further model comparisons to locate the predictive advantage to the provision of continuous lesion evidence beyond the boundary of binary lesion images. The continuous lesion images thus provide a straightforward way to incorporate details of both lesioned and non-lesioned tissue when predicting outcomes after stroke.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.6%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.3%
5
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
8
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
9
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%