Guided Visual Search is associated with a feature-based priority map in early visual cortex
Duecker, K.; Shapiro, K. L.; Hanslmayr, S.; Griffiths, B. J.; Pan, Y.; Wolfe, J.; Jensen, O.
Show abstract
Visual search models have long emphasised that task-relevant items must be prioritised for optimal performance. While it is known that search efficiency also benefits from active distractor inhibition, the underlying neuronal mechanisms are debated. Here, we used MEG in combination with Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) to probe how neuronal excitability in early visual cortex is modulated during feature-guided visual search. Participants were instructed to indicate the presence or absence of a letter "T" presented amongst 16 and 32 "L"s. In the guided search condition, participants were informed about the colour of the "T" and could infer the colour of the irrelevant distractors. In the unguided search condition, the target colour was unknown. We found that guided search was associated with enhanced RIFT responses to the target colour, and decreased responses to the distractor colour compared to unguided search. These results conceptually replicated using both a conventional coherence approach, as well as with a General Linear Model approach based on a single-trial measure of the RIFT response. The present findings expand on previous reports based on electrophysiology and fMRI in humans and non-human primates by revealing that feature-guidance in visual search affects neuronal excitability as early as primary visual cortex.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Task-related modulation of event-related potentials does not reflect changes to sensory representations 97%
- Oscillatory Multi-Timescale Mechanisms Underlying Audiovisual Sequence Prediction 97%
- Measuring the neurodevelopmental trajectory of excitatory-inhibitory balance via visual gamma oscillations 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.