Back

UBR4 regulates a MetAP2-dependent Arg/N-degron pathway

Morrison, E. J.; Horton, E.; Rissland, O.

2024-10-03 molecular biology Community evaluation
10.1101/2024.10.03.616566 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The open reading frame does more than merely encode a linear peptide sequence; it is a reservoir of regulatory information. Here, as part of investigations into how the N-terminal amino acids regulate translation, we serendipitously uncovered a new N-degron that revealed an additional layer of regulation in these pathways. Using reporter assays, we discovered that peptides bearing position 3 arginine or lysine residues at the N-terminus were rapidly degraded in mammalian cells. We found this pathway requires MetAP2, which co-translationally cleaves the N-terminal methionine preceding second position threonine and valines to initiate protein decay. We used CRISPR-Cas9 to knockout key N-recognins and found that these N-degrons are exclusively targeted by the E3 ligase UBR4, but not by UBR1 or UBR2. Together, our results characterize a new N-degron pathway that reveals a unique role for MetAP2 and UBR4 in mediating protein decay. SIGNIFICANCEThe Arg/N-degron pathway targets position 1 or 2 N-terminal Lys and Arg residues via UBR Box E3 ligases to trigger protein decay. Here we show that UBR4 can specifically recognize position 3 Lys and Arg N-termini upon methionine removal by the methionine amino peptidase MetAP2. Accordingly, proteins that bear N-terminal residues that are processed by MetAP1 are unaffected by the loss or inhibition of MetAP2. Using a combination of reporter assays, and bioinformatic approaches were identified endogenous proteins whose N-termini are recognized by this MetAP2-dependent Arg/N-degron pathway. Thus, our results expand the number of Arg/N-degron substrates and describe a new mechanism through which they are targeted.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.