Back

Spatial and network principles behind neural generation of locomotion

Komi, S.; Winther, A.; Houser, G.; Sorensen, R. J.; Larsen, S.; Bonfils, M.; Li, G.; Berg, R. W.

2024-10-04 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.10.03.616472 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Generation of locomotion is a fundamental function of the spinal cord, yet the underlying principles remain unclear. In particular, the relationship between neuronal cell types, networks and functions has been difficult to establish1,2. Here, we propose principles by which functions arise primarily from spatial features of the cord. First, we suggest that projections of distinct cell types constitute an asymmetrical "Mexican hat" topology, i.e. local excitation and surrounding inhibition with dissimilar length of projection along the rostro-caudal axis. Second, this projection topology constitutes the mechanism of rhythm- and pattern generation of mammalian locomotion. Third, the role of segregation of cell types in the transversal plane is for descending fibers to find appropriate targets. Modulation of these targets allows control of motor activity by adjusting the symmetry of the projection topology. We extract these principles via a model of the mouse spinal cord, where networks are constructed by probabilistic sampling of synaptic connections from cell-specific projection patterns, which are based on previous studies3, 4. The cell-type distributions are derived from single-cell RNA sequencing combined with spatial transcriptomics5. We find that essential aspects of locomotion are readily reproduced and controlled without requiring parameter optimization, and several experimental observations can now be explained mechanistically. Further, two main features are predicted: propagating bumps of neural activity during rhythmical activity and formation of static bumps during arrest and posture. Besides linking cell types, structure and function, we propose our approach as a new theoretical framework for motor control.

Published in Nature Communications (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.