Back

Mechanical constraints organize 3D tissues and orchestrate muscle differentiation

Nagle, I.; van der Spek, L.; Gesenhues, P.; Savy, T.; Rea, L.; Richert, A.; Receveur, M.; Delort, F.; Batonnet-Pichon, S.; Wilhelm, C.; Luciani, N.; Reffay, M.

2024-10-04 biophysics
10.1101/2024.10.03.616457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biological tissues achieve proper shape and ordered structures during development through responses to internal and external signals, with mechanical cues playing a crucial role. These forces guide cellular organization, leading to complex self-organizing structures that are foundational to embryonic patterns. Emerging theories and experiments suggest that "topological morphogens" drive these processes. Despite the predominance of three-dimensional (3D) structures in biology, studying 3D tissues remains challenging due to limited model systems and the complexity of modeling. Here, we address these challenges by using self-organized cellular aggregates, specifically spindle-shaped C2C12 myoblasts, subjected to controlled mechanical stretching. Our findings reveal that these cells form a multilayered, actin-oriented tissue structure, where mechanical forces drive long-range 3D organization and muscle differentiation. Notably, tissue surface emerges as a hotspot for differentiation, correlating with directional order as shown by single molecule fluorescent in situ hybridization. Significance StatementWe explore how cells work together to form complex structures, particularly in 3D, using muscle precursors cells (C2C12 myoblasts) as a model. By applying controlled stretching forces, we found that these cells self-organize into layered tissues that guide their transformation into muscle. This research highlights the critical role of physical forces in shaping tissues, suggesting that the way cells are physically arranged and stretched in three dimensions can significantly influence their behavior and function. Our findings offer new insights into how tissues develop and could have implications for tissue engineering, where creating the right 3D environment is key to successful tissue growth and repair.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.3%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.4%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
8
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
10
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.6%
11
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
13
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.7%
15
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
17
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
20
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
21
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
23
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.5%
24
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
25
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%