Back

Anisotropic stretch biases the self-organization of actin fibers in multicellular Hydra aggregates

Bailles, A.; Serafini, G.; Andreas, H.; Zechner, C.; Modes, C. D.; Tomancak, P.

2024-10-02 developmental biology
10.1101/2024.10.02.616220 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During development, groups of cells generate shape by coordinating their mechanical properties through an interplay of self-organization and pre-patterning. Hydra displays a striking planar pattern of actin fibers at the organism scale, and mechanics influence the morphogenesis of biological structures during its pre-patterned regeneration. However, how mechanics participate in the formation of an ordered pattern from a totally disordered state remains unknown. To study this, we used cellular aggregates formed from dissociated Hydra cells, which initially lose all actin polarity yet regenerate a long-range actin pattern. We showed quantitatively that the actin meshwork evolves from a disordered symmetric state to an ordered state in which rotational symmetry is broken, and translation symmetry is partially broken, with the nematic and smectic order parameters increasing over days. During the first hours, the actin meshwork displayed spatial heterogeneity in the nematic order parameter, and ordered domains separated by lines of defects progressively grew and fused. This suggests that local cell-cell interactions drive the transition from disorder to order. To understand the mechanism of ordering, we perturbed the tissues physical constraints. We showed that while topology and geometry do not have a direct effect, anisotropic stretch biases the emerging orientation of the actin meshwork within hours. Surprisingly, although a Wnt protein gradient is expected to play a role in the actin ordering, the stretch-associated alignment happened without a Wnt enrichment. This demonstrates the role of tissue mechanics in the alignment of the actin fibers during the disorder-to-order transition.

Published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.