Phenotypic plasticity can be an evolutionary response to fluctuating environments
Garcia-Galindo, P.; Ahnert, S. E.
Show abstract
Phenotypic plasticity refers to the ability of a single genotype to produce multiple distinct phenotypes. Using the computationally tractable genotype-phenotype (GP) map of RNA secondary structures, we model RNA phenotypic plasticity using the Boltzmann distribution of secondary structures for each genotype. Through evolutionary simulations that involve periodic environmental switching on the GP map, we reveal that RNA phenotypes can adapt to these fluctuations towards an optimal plasticity. The optimal phenotypes exhibit dominant near-equal Boltzmann probabilities of distinct structures, each representing the fittest structure for each alternating environment. Our findings demonstrate that phenotypic plasticity, a widespread biological phenomenon, is a fundamental evolutionary response to changing environments for RNA secondary structure. We also find naturally evolved functional RNAs that exhibit optimal plasticity unlikely to arise by neutral drift alone, suggesting functional relevance in fluctuating environments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Conflicting effects of recombination on the evolvability and robustness in neutrally evolving populations 96%
- An extension of the Walsh-Hadamard transform to calculate and model epistasis in genetic landscapes of arbitrary shape and complexity 96%
- Impact of phylogeny on the inference of functional sectors from protein sequence data 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A method for extracting effective interactions from Hi-C data with applications to interphase chromosomes and inverted nuclei 94%
- Temporally correlated active forces drive segregation and enhanced dynamics in chromosome polymers 94%
- Loop-extruder mediated rigidity can globally order bacterial chromosomes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.