Back

Soft X-ray tomography reveals variations in B.subtilis biofilm structure upon tasA deletion

Chatzimpinou, A.; Diehl, A.; Harhoff, T.; Driller, K.; Vanslembrouck, B.; Chen, J.-H.; Kairiss, K.; Loconte, V.; Le Gros, M.; Larabell, C. A.; Turgay, K.; Oschkinat, H.; Weinhardt, V.

2024-10-02 microbiology
10.1101/2024.10.01.615898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial biofilms are complex communities of cells within a self-produced extracellular matrix. They play crucial roles in healthcare, nutrition, agriculture and environmental research, yet an analysis of their elaborate 3D architecture remains challenging. Understanding mechanisms of biofilm formation, particularly the effects of chemical, physical, and genetic influences or modifications, is crucial but requires structural information at subcellular resolution to enable a community-level analysis of biofilms. In this work, we developed a "biofilm-in-capillary" growth method compatible with full-rotation soft X-ray tomography, providing high-resolution 3D imaging of bacterial cells and their surrounding extracellular matrix during biofilm formation, without drying or fixation steps. This approach offers 50 nm isotropic spatial resolution, rapid imaging time, and quantitative native analysis of biofilm structure. We demonstrate the potential of our method using Bacillus subtilis biofilms, detecting coherent alignment and chaining of wild-type cells while they are travelling towards the oxygen-rich capillary tip region. In stark contrast, the genetic knock-out {Delta}tasA shows a loss of cellular orientation, including changes in the extracellular matrix in volume and chemical density. Notably, we show that the addition of TasA protein to a culture of a {Delta}tasA strain restores the extracellular matrix density and leads to a compaction of cell assemblies, yet no chaining is observed as for the wildtype. Our approach to imaging biofilms is scalable and transferable, opening new avenues for examining biofilm structure and function across various species, including mixed biofilms, and observing 3D reorganization in response to genetic and environmental factors.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.