Back

Effect heterogeneity reveals complex pleiotropic effects of rare coding variants

Lu, W.; Chen, S.; Posthuma, D.; Neale, B.; O'Connor, L. J.; Karczewski, K.

2024-10-02 genetics
10.1101/2024.10.01.614806 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and rare-variant association studies (RVAS) have identified thousands of genes and variants associated with diverse human phenotypes, and have revealed pervasive pleiotropy among common variants; however, the extent of pleiotropy among rare variants remains incompletely characterized. Using rare variant association results from the UK Biobank (UKB), we systematically quantify gene-level pleiotropy across hundreds of phenotypes spanning multiple phenotypic domains and identify genes exhibiting allelic series. We develop ALLSPICE (ALLelic Spectrum of Pleiotropy Informed Correlated Effects), a statistical test for assessing variant effect heterogeneity within pleiotropic genes across quantitative traits. In ALB, a gene associated with both albumin and calcium levels, ALLSPICE reveals a subset of missense variants with heterogeneous effects across these traits. Protein structure-based analyses further demonstrate that missense variants associated with calcium levels but not albumin, as well as variants with opposing effects on the two traits, are enriched near known calcium-binding sites in the ALB protein. In this way, we present a systematic view of gene-level pleiotropy and effect heterogeneity among rare variants, illustrating how shared and trait-specific genetic effects can arise within the same gene. Our analysis provides a general approach for dissecting pleiotropic architecture and detecting rare variants with heterogeneous effects for downstream biological investigation of complex human traits.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.