Percentile Scores for the Revised University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test for 16,972 Individuals 60 years of Age and Older
Pierz, K. A.; Aamodt, W.; Gochanour, C.; Kurth, R.; Brumm, M. C.; Coffey, C. S.; Heathers, L. E.; Totten, M.; Doty, R. L.; Marek, K.; Siderowf, A.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesThe University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) is a widely employed objective measure of smell function. A revised version of this test, termed the UPSIT-R, was developed in 2020 to update certain odorants and response options. The goal of this study was to establish normative age- and sex-specific data for the UPSIT-R in a large adult cohort and to compare the resultant percentiles to those of the original UPSIT. A second study was performed to compare the relative performance of these two tests in a small cohort of persons with and without Parkinsons disease (PD). MethodsUPSIT-R percentiles were derived separately by age (60-64, 65-69, 70-74, 75-59, and [≥]80 years) and sex (male, female) categories in 16,972 volunteers who were predominantly white and non-Hispanic. Percentiles were derived statistically using an empirical distribution averaging procedure. A Bland-Altman plot was employed to visualize the level of agreement between percentiles for the UPSIT-R and UPSIT. For the second study, non-parametric statistics were employed to compare the results of those with and without PD. ResultsUPSIT-R performance declined with increasing age; deficits were more pronounced in men than in women. The magnitude of the difference between the original and revised test percentile scores differed by age and sex; women had up to a 3-point improvement with the UPSIT-R whereas the oldest male age had up to a 3-point decline in percentile scores. Olfactory deficits in PD were confirmed on the UPSIT-R. DiscussionThis study provides normative data clinically useful for assessing the relative degree of dysfunction in persons 60 years of age and older using the UPSIT-R. Like the traditional version of the UPSIT, this version demonstrates that smell function declines with age and is generally better in women than in men, providing a solid clinical basis for physicians to accurately determine the degree of smell dysfunction in their patients. Trial Registration InformationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05065060
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Disease progression strikingly differs in research and real-world Parkinson's populations 96%
- Remote Real Time Digital Monitoring fills a Critical Gap in the Management of Parkinson’s disease 95%
- Digital markers from smartwatch data relate to non-motor clinical examinations of Parkinson’s disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- α4β2 * Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptor Target Engagement in Parkinson Disease Gait-Balance Disorders 95%
- Development of Parkinson’s disease and its relationship with incidentally-discovered white matter disease and covert brain infarction in a real world cohort 95%
- Persistent racial disparities in deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Online unsupervised performance-based cognitive testing: a feasible and reliable approach to scalable cognitive phenotyping of Parkinson’s patients 95%
- Time perception reflects individual differences in motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease 94%
- Effect of Eight-Week Online Cognitive Training in Parkinson’s Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-Motor symptoms in prodromal Parkinson’s disease are linked to reduced Quality of Life 95%
- Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative: A Milestone-Based Strategy to Monitor PD Progression 95%
- Amplification parameters of the alpha-synuclein seed amplification assay on CSF predict the clinical subtype of Parkinson's Disease at 10-year follow-up 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.