Back

Diverse Participant Recruitment for Infant Sequencing in the BabySeq Project

del Rosario, M. C.; Walmsley, S. A.; Harrison, B. W.; Stephens, C. T.; Zettler, B.; Rivera-Cruz, G.; Agrawal, P.; Brower, A.; Chigbu, S.; Christensen, K. D.; Genetti, C. A.; Givens, R.; Gold, N. B.; Reeves, I. V.; Schichter, I.; Shariat, H.; Simon, S.; Stevens Smith, H.; Uveges, M. K.; Green, R. C.; Holm, I. A.; Pereira, S.

2024-10-07 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.10.01.24314717 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeIt is essential that studies of genomic sequencing (GS) in newborns and children include individuals from under-represented racial and ethnic groups (URG) to ensure future applications are equitably implemented. We conducted interviews with parents from URG to better understand their perspectives on GS research, develop strategies to reduce barriers to enrollment, and facilitate research participation. MethodsSemi-structured interviews with 50 parents from URG. ResultsNearly all parents (44) said they would be interested in participating in an infant GS study. Parents were interested in participating in GS research for reasons including clinical utility, personal utility, and/or family health benefits. Deterrents to enrollment cited by parents were discomfort with enrollment procedures (e.g., not wanting a heel stick), limited emotional bandwidth, unfavorable perceptions of the study, and concerns about potential results. Most parents (35 of 40) said they would want to receive all types of genetic results, including actionable and non-actionable, as well as childhood- and adult-onset. ConclusionOur findings demonstrate that parents from URG are interested in participating in GS research. Based upon these findings, we provide recommendations for designing GS studies that are responsive to their concerns.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.