Family-GWAS reveals effects of environment and mating on genetic associations
Tan, T.; Jayashankar, H.; Guan, J.; Nehzati, S. M.; Mir, M.; Bennett, M.; Agerbo, E.; Ahlskog, R.; Pinto de Andrade Anapaz, V.; Asvold, B. O.; Benonisdottir, S.; Bhatta, L.; Boomsma, D. I.; Brumpton, B.; Campbell, A.; Chabris, C. F.; Cheesman, R.; Chen, Z.; China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group, ; de Geus, E.; Ehli, E. A.; Elnahas, A. G.; Estonian Biobank Research Team, ; Finngen Authors, ; Ganna, A.; Giannelis, A.; Hakaste, L.; Hansen, A. F.; Havdahl, A.; Hayward, C.; Hottenga, J.-J.; Houmark, M. A.; Hveem, K.; Kaprio, J.; Langhammer, A.; Latvala, A.; Lee, J. J.; Lehtovirta, M.; Li, L
Show abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have discovered thousands of replicable genetic associations, guiding drug target discovery and powering genetic prediction of human phenotypes and diseases. However, genetic associations can be affected by gene-environment correlations and non-random mating, which can lead to biased inferences in downstream analyses. Family-based GWAS (FGWAS) uses the natural experiment of random assignment of genotype within families to separate out the contribution of direct genetic effects (DGEs) -- causal effects of alleles in an individual on an individual -- from other factors contributing to genetic associations. Here, we report results from an FGWAS meta-analysis of 34 phenotypes from 17 cohorts. We found evidence that factors uncorrelated with DGEs make substantial contributions to genetic associations for 27 phenotypes, with population stratification confounding -- a form of gene-environment correlation -- likely the major cause. By estimating SNP heritability and genetic correlations using DGEs, we found evidence that assortative mating has led to overestimation of SNP heritability for 5 phenotypes and overestimation of the degree of shared genetic effects (pleiotropy) between 22 pairs of phenotypes. Polygenic predictors constructed from DGEs are particularly useful for studying natural selection, assortative mating, and indirect genetic effects (effects of relatives genes mediated through the family environment). We validate our meta-analysis results by predicting phenotypes in hold-out samples using polygenic predictors constructed from DGEs, achieving statistically significant out-of-sample prediction for 24 phenotypes with little attenuation of predictive power within-families. We provide FGWAS summary statistics for 34 phenotypes that can be used for downstream analyses. Our study provides both a template for performing FGWAS and an argument for its value for debiasing inferences and understanding the impact of environment and mating patterns.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-specific causal disease effect sizes in functionally important regions impacted by selection 97%
- Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits 97%
- Theoretical and empirical quantification of the accuracy of polygenic scores in ancestry divergent populations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enrichment analyses identify shared associations for 25 quantitative traits in over 600,000 individuals from seven diverse ancestries 97%
- Gene-environment interactions using a Bayesian whole genome regression model 97%
- Estimation of non-additive genetic variance in human complex traits from a large sample of unrelated individuals 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.