Back

Typical indicators of neighborhood change that are used to define gentrification have opposing associations with infant mortality

Murosko, D.; Passarella, M.; Montoya-Williams, D.; Mehdipanah, R.; Lorch, S.

2024-10-02 pediatrics
10.1101/2024.10.01.24314643 medRxiv
Show abstract

Infant mortality (IM), or death prior to the first birthday, is a key public health metric that increases with neighborhood structural inequities. However, neighborhood exposures shift as communities undergo gentrification, a pattern of neighborhood change defined by increasing affluence (in wealth, education, and housing costs). Gentrification has inconsistent associations with infant health outcomes like IM, which may be due to differing relationships between its composite measures and such outcomes. We designed a retrospective cohort analysis of all births and deaths from 2010-2019 across 4 metropolitan areas in Michigan to determine how gentrification and its neighborhood-change components are associated with risk of IM, using multilevel multivariable logistic regression models. Among 672,432 infants, 0.52% died before 1 year. IM was not associated with gentrification. Census tracts with greater increases in income and education had lower rates of IM, but tracts with greater increases in rent costs had higher rates of IM. In unadjusted models, odds of IM were 40% and 15% lower for infants living in tracts in the top quartile increase in household income and college completion, respectively, compared to infants from tracts with the least amount of change. Odds of IM were also increased 29% in infants from tracts with the most increases in rent, though these differences were attenuated when adjusting for individual social factors. Indicators of increasing community affluence have opposing relationships with IM. Policies and interventions that address rising housing costs may reduce IM.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
2
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
5
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
9
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
13
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
15
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
16
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
18
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
21
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
24
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
28
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%