Back

Multiplexed functional analysis of TAP2 variants in regulating MHC-I cell surface abundance reveals overexpression of PLK1 downregulates antigen presentation.

Nagy, G.; Presley, R.; Jeon, H.; Moreira, L.; Dhar, S.; Tull, O.; Soysal, B.; Yadati, A. S.; Cook, K. D.; Schnell, L. E.; Gupta, A.; Banerjee, T.; Chung, D.; Tsichlis, P. N.; Parvin, J. D.

2024-10-02 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.09.30.615919 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The abundance of MHC-I on the cell surface depends on its association with antigenic peptides transported to the endoplasmic reticulum by the Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing (TAP), a peptide channel composed of TAP1 and TAP2. We functionally screened over 1400 TAP2 variants for effects on MHC-I cell surface abundance. Amino-acid substitutions of loss of function (LOF) variants clustered in the NTP-binding domain and along the TAP1-TAP2 binding interface, suggesting that these variants interfered with TAP conformational changes associated with peptide transport. Some LOF variants carried potential phosphomimetic substitutions; one such substitution at Ser251 was embedded in a sequence context consistent with the phosphorylation motif of PLK kinases. Inhibition of PLK kinases increased MHC-I surface expression, while overexpression of PLK1 in cells decreased MHC-I in wild type TAP2, but not in TAP2-S251A-expressing cells. Importantly, site-specific phosphorylation of TAP2 in human tumor samples correlated with alterations of gene expression in the cell cycle and antigen presentation pathways, consistent with the notion that phosphorylation downregulates antigenic peptide transport in human tumors. These data strongly support the hypothesis that in cancer cells, TAP2 phosphorylation by PLK1, and perhaps other kinases, can downregulate the antigen presentation process.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.