Design and evaluation of an automated real-time SOFA score calculator in an electronic health record system, for early sepsis diagnosis
Smitt Einarson, G.; Nordqvist, H.; Marking, U.; Jonmarker, S.; Parke, A.; Unge, C.; Yu, D.; Sunden Cullberg, J.; Stralin, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn patients with infections, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score should be used to diagnose sepsis. However, manual SOFA calculation is time consuming. Thus, we developed an automated real-time SOFA score application that has been fully implemented into the major electronic health record (EHR) system (TakeCare) in Stockholm. We aimed to describe the method and evaluate its performance for detection of sepsis. MethodWe developed an automated SOFA application that presents a total score (SOFATotal) over time and a baseline score (SOFAChronic) based on outpatient data prior to hospital admission. We evaluated its performance on 583 sepsis alert patients in an emergency department, including 472 with sepsis according to manually calculated SOFA (SOFAManual). SOFATotal at 30 minutes and 3 hours, and quick-SOFA (qSOFA) were compared with SOFAManual for detection of sepsis. The acute SOFA score (SOFAAcute) was calculated by subtracting SOFAChronic from SOFATotal. ResultsSOFATotal at 3 hours showed moderate-good agreement with SOFAManual (R{superscript 2} = 0.76). Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for sepsis detection were 0.83 at 30 minutes, 0.94 at 3 hours for SOFATotal, and 0.67 for qSOFA. Among patients with SOFAChronic [≥]1 (21% of cases), SOFATotal of [≥]2 was observed in 90% of cases (mortality 13.5%), although SOFAAcute of [≥]2 was noted in 63% (mortality 16.7%). ConclusionThe automated SOFA score demonstrated effectiveness in early sepsis detection, outperforming qSOFA, but adjustments for chronic baseline scores were necessary to avoid over-diagnosis. Further studies on broader patient populations would be useful to validate its clinical use.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the AmsterdamUMCdb intensive care dataset 96%
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 96%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 96%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 95%
- Standard blood laboratory results in SARS-CoV-19 positive patients: do they show a typical pattern? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 92%
- A Predictive Model to Identify Complicated Clostridiodes difficile Infection 90%
- Reduction in risk of death among patients admitted with COVID-19 between first and second epidemic waves in New York City 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of bacterial co-infections and prediction of fatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department using a 29 mRNA host response classifier 93%
- Evaluation of flow cytometry for cell count and detection of bacteria in biological fluids. 91%
- Comparative Diagnostic Evaluation of Real-Time PCR and Culture for Detecting Pathogens in Podiatric Wound Infections 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Daily variation in blood glucose levels during continuous enteral nutrition in patients on the Intensive Care Unit: a retrospective observational study 90%
- Randomised Controlled Trial of Intravenous Nafamostat Mesylate in COVID pneumonitis: Phase 1b/2a Experimental Study to Investigate Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics 88%
- Spatial and temporal dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.