Back

The fathers singing voice may impact premature infants brain more than their mothers: A study protocol and preliminary data on a singing and EEG randomized controlled trial (RCT) based on the fundamental frequency of voice and kinship parameters

Papatzikis, E.; Dimitropoulos, K.; Tataropoulou, K.; Kyrtsoudi, M.; Pasoudi, E.; OToole, J. M.; Nika, A.

2024-09-30 pediatrics
10.1101/2024.09.29.24314570 medRxiv
Show abstract

This article presents the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating the impact of singing on the brain activity of premature infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The study focuses on how the differentiation of voices, as defined by the fundamental frequency (F0) shaped by biological sex and kinship, influences neurophysiological responses when measured by electroencephalography (EEG). Premature infants, who are highly sensitive to auditory stimuli, may benefit from music-based interventions; however, there is limited understanding of how voice variations between male and female caregivers, and whether they are biologically related, affect brain activity. Our protocol outlines a structured intervention where infants are exposed to singing by four facilitators - a male music therapist, a female music therapist, the mother, and the father - and includes two singing stages: a sustained note (A at 440 Hz) and a 90-second lullaby, both interspersed with silent periods to allow for baseline measurements. EEG recordings track brain activity throughout these sessions, followed by quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis and thorough statistical computations (e.g., mixed-effects models, spectral power analysis, and post-hoc tests) to explore how these auditory stimuli influence brain function. Preliminary data from five infants show that maternal singing elicits the highest delta spectral power in all measured conditions except during the lullaby song, where paternal singing elicits the highest effects followed by the male music therapist and then the mother. These early findings highlight the potential influence of parental voices, particularly the fathers voice, on neonatal brain development, while the detailed study protocol ensures rigor and replicability, providing a robust framework for future research. Additionally, this protocol lays the groundwork for exploring the long-term effects of music-based interventions, with the goal of improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in premature infants through tailored auditory stimulation. (clinincaltrials.gov unique identifier: NCT06398912)

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.4%
2
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.5%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
7
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
23
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
24
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.5%
26
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
27
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.5%