Back

Understanding Thromboembolus Transport Patterns In The Brain For Stroke In The Presence Of Carotid Artery Stenosis

Roopnarinesingh, R.; Jani, N. D.; Leppert, M.; Mukherjee, D.

2024-09-30 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.09.29.24314524 medRxiv
Show abstract

Deciphering the source of an embolism is a common challenge encountered in stroke treatment. Carotid stenosis is a key source of embolic strokes. Carotid interventions can be indicated when a patient has greater than 50% stenosis in the carotid ipsilateral to the cerebral infarction, which is designated as the symptomatic carotid. However, there are often significant number of cases where carotid emboli travel contralaterally leading to ambiguity regarding which carotid is symptomatic. We use a patient-specific computational embolus-hemodynamics interaction model developed in prior works to conduct an in silico experiment spanning 30 heart-to-brain arterial models with differing combinations of bilateral severe and mild stenosis degrees. We used these models to study source-to-destination transport of thromboemboli released from left/right carotid disease sites, and cardiogenic sources. Across all cases considered, thromboemboli from left and right carotid sources showed non-zero contralateral transport. We also found that cardiogenic thromboemboli do not have an altered hemisphere distribution or distinct transport preference dependent on stenosis degree, thus potentially making the underlying etiology more cryptic. In patients with carotid stenosis or chronic occlusion ipsilateral to the area affected by stroke, we have demonstrated that the presence of contralateral stenosis can cause emboli that travel across the Circle of Willis (CoW) which can potentially lead to ambiguity when deciding which carotid is truly symptomatic.

Published in PLOS Computational Biology (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.