A systematic review to identify research gaps in studies modeling vaccination strategies against Neisseria infections
Metelmann, S.; Thompson, A.; Donten, A.; Oke, S.; Sun, S.; Borrow, R.; Xu, F.; Vivancos, R.; Decraene, V.; Pellis, L.; Hall, I.
Show abstract
The genus Neisseria includes two major human pathogens: N. meningitidiscausing bacterial meningitis/septicemia and N. gonorrhoeae causing gonorrhoea. Mathematical models have been used to simulate their transmission and control strategies, and the recent observation of a meningitis vaccine being partially effective against gonorrhoea has led to an increased modeling interest. Here we conducted a systematic review of the literature, focusing on studies that model vaccination strategies against Neisseria incidence and antimicrobial resistance. Using journal, preprint, and grey literature repositories, we identified 52 studies that we reviewed for validity, model approaches and assumptions. Most studies showed a good quality of evidence, and the variety of approaches along with their different modeling angles, was assuring especially for gonorrhoea studies. We identified options for future research, including the combination of both meningococcal and gonococcal infections in studies to have better estimates for vaccine benefits, and the spill over of gonorrhoea infections from the heterosexual to the MSM community and vice versa. Cost-effectiveness studies looking at at-risk and the wider populations can then be used to inform vaccine policies on gonorrhoea, as they have for meningococcal disease.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the impact of COVID-19 vaccination in Lebanon: A call to speed-up vaccine roll out 94%
- The Societal Value of Vaccines: Expert-Based Conceptual Framework and Methods Using COVID-19 Vaccines as A Case Study 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of quadrivalent versus trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines for the Portuguese elderly population 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk-benefit analysis of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in Australia using a Bayesian network modelling framework 95%
- Modelling the relative benefits of using the measles vaccine outside cold chain for outbreak response 95%
- Resource Allocation for Different Types of Vaccines against COVID-19: Tradeoffs and Synergies between Efficacy and Reach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccines for reducing susceptibility to infection with the Delta variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- Comparing alternative cholera vaccination strategies in Maela refugee camp using a transmission model 94%
- The impact of introducing meningococcal C/ACWY booster vaccination among adolescents in Germany: a dynamic transmission modelling study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling geographic vaccination strategies for COVID-19 in Norway 94%
- A simulation-based method to inform serosurvey designs for estimating dengue force of infection using existing blood samples 93%
- When should lockdown be implemented? Devising cost-effective strategies for managing epidemics amid vaccine uncertainty 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.