Investigating the integration of sustainable food initiatives in healthcare institutions in Ontario, Canada: A grey literature scoping review protocol
Blank, L. L.; Milano, A. D.; Andrade, L.; Kirkpatrick, S. I.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe climate emergency and other sustainability challenges interact to threaten human and planetary health. Efforts to improve the sustainability of food initiatives within healthcare institutions could mitigate these threats by addressing the four pillars of sustainability: health, social, economic, and environmental. Understanding current initiatives to incorporate sustainability into food programs and the sustainability pillars that guide those initiatives is important to inform priorities for action. This scoping review was undertaken to investigate the extent to which major healthcare institutions in Ontario, Canada have publicly committed to, discussed, planned, and/or implemented sustainable food initiatives. Methods and AnalysisSteps are based on guidance from the Joanna Briggs Institute and Arksey & OMalley. First, the current strategic plans of 57 healthcare institutions in Ontario, Canada, will be retrieved from their websites and used to examine whether they include any commitments to or discussion, planning, and/or implementation of relevant initiatives. The healthcare institution websites, along with those of selected sustainability organizations, will be searched for grey literature from 2015 to 2024 describing sustainable food initiatives within these institutions. Documents will be screened for eligibility by two researchers. Data related to the incorporation of sustainable food into institutional food programs, and the sustainability pillars addressed, will be extracted by one researcher, with 10% of entries verified by a second researcher. The data will be synthesized to summarize publicly reported progress toward integrating sustainable food into healthcare institutions. Ethics and DisseminationThis review will use publicly available grey literature with no expectation of privacy and no research participants; therefore, no ethics clearance is required. Results will be shared with stakeholders in sustainability organizations, as well as at relevant conferences and in peer-reviewed journals, such as the Healthy Cities Conference and the Journal of Canadian Food Studies. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework and can be accessed at the following URL: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CU9P6
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 93%
- A randomised controlled trial to test the effects of fish aggregating devices and SBC activities promoting fish consumption in Timor-Leste: A study protocol 91%
- Integrating co-design into formative research for a SBCC entry-point platform for nutrition-sensitive social protection programs in low -and middle-income country settings. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparative national-level analysis of government food system resilience activities in preparation for future food system disruptions 93%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 92%
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Native American Resilience to Protect Family Nutrition During a Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis 92%
- Architecture of systems affecting disease trajectories in a conflict zone: A community-centered systems inquiry in North Gaza 92%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-production of informal settlement health: A community based participatory research program for building healthy communities in urban informal settlements of Salvador, Brazil. 91%
- Cross-sector Decision Landscape in Response to COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of North Carolina Decision-Makers 91%
- Applying the Nova food classification to food product databases using discriminative ingredients: a methodological proposal 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does WASH FIT improve water, sanitation, and hygiene and related health impacts in healthcare facilities? A systematic review 92%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 91%
- “Climate change and health?”: Knowledge and perceptions among key stakeholders in Puducherry, India 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.