Diagnostic Efficacy of Various Imaging Modalities Across Different Stages of Prostate Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies
Shi, C.; Yu, K.; hu, y.; Wang, Y.; Bu, F.; Lu, J.; gang, w.
Show abstract
PurposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of various imaging modalities in detecting and monitoring prostate cancer across different disease stages using diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) and network meta-analysis (NMA). MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies evaluating mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT, MRE, MRSI, BS, CT, PET, and other tracers for prostate cancer detection. Data on sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and detection rate were extracted and analyzed using NMA. ResultAcross 123 studies involving 9,371 patients, 68Ga-P16-093 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-617 PET/CT showed high diagnostic accuracy in early-phase prostate cancer. For lymph node metastasis, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI was the most sensitive. 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT had the highest specificity and PPV, while 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT had the highest NPV. In bone metastasis, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI excelled in sensitivity and NPV, while 18F-Fluciclovine PET/CT had the highest specificity and PPV. For biochemical recurrence, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT had the highest lesion detection rate, and for different radiotracers, 18F-PSMA-1007 had the highest detection rate. ConclusionThis network meta-analysis comprehensively evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of various imaging modalities for prostate cancer across different stages. Our findings underscore the strengths and limitations of each imaging technique in detecting and staging prostate cancer.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Analytical performance of a highly sensitive system to detect gene variants using next-generation sequencing for lung cancer companion diagnostics 88%
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 88%
- Deep learning models for poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images using transfer learning 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Glycoprofiling of proteins as prostate cancer biomarkers: a multinational population study 94%
- The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Manganese-enhanced MRI (MEMRI) in breast and prostate cancers: exploring the potential role of calcium receptors. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Retrospective Validation of an Artificial Intelligence System for Diagnostic Assessment of Prostate Biopsies on the ProMort Cohort: Study Protocol 93%
- Protocol summary and statistical analysis plan for the randomized trial of early detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (ProScreen) 91%
- Moving forward through consensus: a national Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in prostate cancer in Uganda 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of HOXB13 expression in neuroendocrine prostate cancer 93%
- Accurate prognosis for localized prostate cancer through coherent voting networks and multi-omic data 92%
- PathProfiler: Automated Quality Assessment of Retrospective Histopathology Whole-Slide Image Cohorts by Artificial Intelligence, A Case Study for Prostate Cancer Research 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Re-irradiation to the Prostate using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after initial definitive Radiotherapy – A systematic review and Meta-analysis of recent trials 92%
- Auto-Detection and Segmentation of Involved Lymph Nodes in HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Cancer Using a Convolutional Deep Learning Neural Network 90%
- Development of a High-Performance Multiparametric MRI Oropharyngeal Primary Tumor Auto-Segmentation Deep Learning Model and Investigation of Input Channel Effects: Results from a Prospective Imaging Registry 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.