Back

Positive and Negative Retinotopic Codes in the Human Hippocampus

Angeli, P. A.; Steel, A.; Silson, E. H.; Robertson, C. E.

2024-10-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.27.615397 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The hippocampus sits at the apex of the visual hierarchy, yet little is known about the visual properties of this core memory structure. Recent work suggests that a latent, bivalent retinotopic code persists in large-scale memory networks at the cortical apex, scaffolding interactions with sensory networks. Here, we tested whether a bivalent retinotopic code also persists within the hippocampus. To do this, we leveraged densely-sampled high-resolution 7T functional MRI along with voxel-scale visual population receptive field (pRF) modeling. Our findings reveal a robust, voxel-scale retinotopic code broadly distributed across subfields and along the long axis of the human hippocampus, comprised of roughly equal proportions of pRFs with positive and negative amplitude responses to visual stimulation. Hippocampal pRFs displayed canonical visual properties, including stable valence and visual field preferences across runs and a contralateral bias. Retinotopic structure also persisted at rest: hippocampal voxels with similar pRF locations were more strongly correlated than voxels representing different visual field locations. Finally, across the ventral visual stream, the prevalence of negative-amplitude pRFs increased with mnemonic involvement, culminating in the balanced, bivalent organization within the hippocampus. These findings support the view that sensory and mnemonic systems are coupled through a shared retinotopic code at the apex of the visual hierarchy.

Published in Journal of Neuroscience · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.