Back

Ultra-processed food consumption and risk of lung cancer: Results from a Prospective Study

Mekonnen, T. C.; Melaku, Y. A.; Shi, Z.; Tiffany Gill, T. K.

2024-09-30 nutrition
10.1101/2024.09.27.24314515 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsThere is limited evidence on the link between ultra-processed food (UPF) intake and the risk of lung cancer (LC). This study examined the association between UPF and LC risk using data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer trial. MethodsThis study involved PLCO participants (n = 96,607, aged [≥] 55 years) who were followed between 1998 and 2009. Food items were categorized based on the NOVA classification. Cox regression models with inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) were utilized to estimate the association between UPF intake and LC risk. The joint effect of UPF and diabetes was explored using additive hazard models to calculate the additional number of LC cases. ResultsDuring a median follow-up period of 9.4 years, 1,596 incident LC cases were identified. UPF consumption (in %gram/day) showed no significant association with the overall risk of LC. However, adults with diabetes in the highest quintile of UPF intake had a significantly higher risk of LC (HR = 2.44; 95% CI: 1.27, 4.67) compared to participants without diabetes. A small excess risk due to the interaction between UPF and diabetes (0.13; 95% CI -0.32, 0.58) was observed, resulting in an additional 201 cases of LC per 105 person-years (95% CI: 70, 332) attributed to the highest UPF intake and diabetes interaction. Furthermore, a 10% increment in UPF intake (%kcal/day) increased the risk of LC by 32%. ConclusionsWhile UPF, in terms of weight contribution, is associated with a higher risk of LC in participants with diabetes, UPF (in %kcal/day), is associated with an increased risk of LC in all participants. Lowering UPF intake may help reduce the risk of LC in both diabetic patients and the general population.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
5
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
8
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
15
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
22
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
23
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%