Quantifying the impact of real-world evidence: the sacubitril/valsartan experience
Epstein, A. J.; Persky, M. H.; Rathore, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe impact of RWE publication on use of approved therapies--including the existence of an effect and timing of impact--is unknown. MethodsWe assessed the relationship between the cadence of RWE publications and sales of sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto(R)) following launch. Publication data were derived from a PubMed search over 7/01/2015-12/31/2023 for English-language, human subjects studies with the drug name (Entresto(R) or sacubitril) and indication (heart failure) in the title or abstract. Quarterly RWE publication data were combined with quarterly information on sacubitril/valsartan sales over the 34-quarter period spanning Q3 2015 through Q4 2023. Quarter-to-quarter change in total sales was modeled with linear regression as a function of counts of previously published RWE-related studies, adjusting for a linear time trend to control for any underlying trends in sales growth; change in total sales from the quarter prior to publication to the quarter of publication to control for recent sales changes; and the cumulative count of RWE publications from Q3 2015 through the previous quarter to control for the contribution of previous RWE publications to future sales. ResultsThe PubMed search identified 888 studies; of these, 333 (37.5%) were classified as RWE-related. An additional RWE-related publication (in quarter q) was associated with an estimated mean increase in quarterly sales of $1.8M (from quarter q to q+1 following publication), $3.5M (from q+1 to q+2), and $2.7M (from q+2 to q+3). In adjusted models, an additional RWE publication was associated with a mean gain in sales from quarter q+1 to q+2 of $2.6M (95% CI -$0.2M to $5.4M). RWE publications were not associated with an increase in sales in the quarter following publication, and the association was attenuated by third quarter following publication. ConclusionRWE studies were associated with increased use of sacubitril/valsaratan, providing preliminary evidence of RWEs ability to support therapy adoption.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient-Reported Reasons for Antihypertensive Medication Change: A Quantitative Study Using Social Media 92%
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 91%
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of Conflict-of-Interest Disclosures of Physician-Authors Publishing in High-Impact U.S. Medical Journals: A Comparison of the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine 92%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 91%
- Financial Conflicts of Interest among U.S. Physician Authors of 2020 Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Indicators of Reproducibility and Transparency in Published Cardiology Literature 91%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 89%
- Urinary Proteomic Signature of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonism by Spironolactone: Evidence from the Randomized-Controlled HOMAGE and PRIORITY Trials 88%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.