Back

Histology-guided MRI segmentation of brainstem nuclei critical to consciousness

Olchanyi, M. D.; Augustinack, J.; Haynes, R. L.; Lewis, L. D.; Cicero, N.; Li, J.; Destrieux, C.; Folkerth, R. D.; Kinney, H. C.; Fischl, B.; Brown, E. N.; Iglesias, J. E.; Edlow, B. L.

2024-10-18 neurology
10.1101/2024.09.26.24314117 medRxiv
Show abstract

While substantial progress has been made in mapping the connectivity of cortical networks responsible for conscious awareness, neuroimaging analysis of subcortical arousal networks that modulate arousal (i.e., wakefulness) has been limited by a lack of a robust segmentation procedures for brainstem arousal nuclei. Automated segmentation of brainstem arousal nuclei is an essential step toward elucidating the physiology of arousal in human consciousness and the pathophysiology of disorders of consciousness. We created a probabilistic atlas of brainstem arousal nuclei built on diffusion MRI scans of five ex vivo human brain specimens scanned at 750 {micro}m isotropic resolution. Labels of arousal nuclei used to generate the probabilistic atlas were manually annotated with reference to nucleus-specific immunostaining in two of the five brain specimens. We then developed a Bayesian segmentation algorithm that utilizes the probabilistic atlas as a generative model and automatically identifies brainstem arousal nuclei in a resolution- and contrast-agnostic manner. The segmentation method displayed high accuracy in both healthy and lesioned in vivo T1 MRI scans and high test-retest reliability across both T1 and T2 MRI contrasts. Finally, we show that the segmentation algorithm can detect volumetric changes and differences in magnetic susceptibility within brainstem arousal nuclei in Alzheimers disease and traumatic coma, respectively. We release the probabilistic atlas and Bayesian segmentation tool in FreeSurfer to advance the study of human consciousness and its disorders.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.