Back

3D photogrammetry as a low cost, portable and noninvasive method for acoustic modeling of hearing

Vesterholm, K. K.; Häfele, F. T.; Figeac, F.; Jakobsen, L.

2024-09-27 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2024.09.25.614918 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIAnimals with specialized hearing such as bats utilize the directionality of their hearing for complicated tasks such as navigation and foraging. The directionality of hearing can be described through the head related transfer function (HRTF). Current state of the art for obtaining the HRTF involves either direct measurement with a microphone at the eardrum, or a CT (micro computed tomography) scan to create a 3D model of the head for acoustic modelling. Both methods usually involve dead animals. C_LIO_LIWe developed a 3D photogrammetry approach to create scaled 3D models of bats with sufficient detail to simulate the HRTF using the boundary element method (BEM). We designed a setup of 28 cameras to obtain 3D models and HRTF from live awake bats. We directly compare the mesh models generated by our photogrammetry method and from CT scans as well as the simulated HRTFs from both with measurements using an in-ear microphone. C_LIO_LIGeometries of the mesh models match well between photogrammetry and CT, but with increasing errors where line of sight is compromised for photogrammetry. The resulting HRTFs are in great agreement when comparing CT and in-ear measurements to photogrammetry (correlation coefficients above 0.6). The 3D model and simulated HRTF of the live and awake bat likewise aligns well to the results from the deceased animals. C_LIO_LIPhotogrammetry is a viable alternative to CT scans for the generation of surface models of small animals. These models allow numerical modelling of HRTFs at biologically relevant frequencies. Moreover, photogrammetry allows for model generation and subsequent HRTF simulation of live, awake animals, abolishing the need for euthanasia and anesthesia. It paves the way for large scale acquisition of 3D models for various purposes including HRTFs. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 2%
33.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.9%
3
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
5
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
9
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.4%
16
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
23
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
25
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
26
Current Research in Neurobiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%