Back

A massive community-science dataset reveals convergent evolution of delayed flowering phenology in North American red-flowering plants

McKenzie, P. F.; Berardi, A. E.; Hopkins, R.

2024-10-22 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2024.09.25.614826 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The radiation of angiosperms is marked by a phenomenal diversity of floral size, shape, color, scent, and reward. Through hundreds of years of documentation and quantification, scientists have sought to make sense of this variation by defining pollination syndromes. These syndromes are the convergent evolution of common suits of floral traits across distantly related species that have evolved by selection to optimize pollination strategies. The availability of community-science datasets provides an opportunity to develop new tools and to examine new traits that may help further characterize broad patterns of flowering plant diversity. Here we test the hypothesis that flowering phenology can also be a pollination syndrome trait. We generate a novel flower color dataset by using GPT-4 with Vision (GPT-4V) to assign flower color to 11,729 North American species. We map these colors to 1,674,908 community-scientist observations of flowering plants to investigate patterns of phenology. We demonstrate constrained flowering time in the eastern United States for plants with red or orange flowers relative to plants with flowers of other colors. Red-and orange-colored flowers are often characteristic of the "hummingbird" pollination syndrome; importantly, the onset of red and orange flowers corresponds to the arrival of migratory hummingbirds. Our results suggest that the hummingbird pollination syndrome can include flowering phenology and reveal an opportunity to expand the suite of traits included in pollination syndromes. Our methods demonstrate an effective pipeline for leveraging enormous amounts of community science data by using artificial intelligence to extract information about patterns of trait variation.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.9%
2
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
4
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
7
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.1%
10
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
11
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
14
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
18
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
20
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
22
Plant Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%