Prevalence and Determinants of Prehospital Impression of Stroke in Ischemic Stroke Patients
Caffarelli, M.; Wood, A. J.; Crowe, R. P.; Amorim, E.; Kamel, H.; Kim, A. S.; Guterman, E. L.
Show abstract
BACKGROUNDEmergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians are front-line in evaluating patients with stroke in the community. Their ability to correctly identify stroke influences downstream management decisions. We sought to use a large national database of prehospital clinical data to determine risk factors associated with missed EMS stroke identification. METHODSRetrospective study examining EMS evaluation of adults with Emergency Department (ED) stroke diagnosis. We leveraged the ESO Data Collaborative research dataset containing EHR data from 2019-2022 that has a subset of encounters with linked hospital diagnostic codes. Our primary outcome was the presence of an EMS diagnosis of stroke. We evaluated the association between demographic and clinical variables with EMS stroke identification using Pearson {chi}2 test for demographic variables and multivariable GLM for clinical variables with adjustment for demographic variables. RESULTSWe identified 34,504 EMS encounters for patients with ED stroke diagnosis. Of these, 11,077 (32.1%) strokes had missed EMS stroke identification and instead had an EMS impression of "Generalized Weakness" (25.9%), "Altered Level of Consciousness" (24.9%), and "Dizziness" (7.2%). Patients more likely to have missed prehospital stroke identification were of Black race (p=0.0001) and Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.0001). Clinical variables associated with higher risk of missed EMS stroke identification were suspected alcohol or drug use (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.37-1.59), low GCS (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.10-1.24), tachycardia (RR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09), and hypotension (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.34-1.61). CONCLUSIONSApproximately 1-in-3 patients transported by EMS did not have their stroke identified in the prehospital setting. Factors associated with lower odds of missed EMS stroke identification provide a starting point for future performance improvement initiatives.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Persistent Inequities in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the U.S.: Results from the NIS 96%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 95%
- COVID-19 Infection Is Associated with Poor Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 96%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 96%
- Risk, clinical course and outcome of ischemic stroke in patients hospitalized with COVID-19: a multicenter cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 95%
- Documented Goals of Care Conversations with Hospitalized Patients after Severe Stroke 94%
- Usage of Mineralocorticoids and Isotonic Crystalloids in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients in the United States 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors Associated with Stroke after COVID-19 Vaccination: A Statewide Analysis 93%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 93%
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prehospital triage of intracranial hemorrhage and anterior large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: the value of the rapid arterial occlusion evalution 97%
- Treatment of Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A 20-year National Inpatient Sample Review 94%
- A hybrid simulation-based workshop improves knowledge and confidence in the management of hemorrhagic conversion of stroke among interventional neurology trainees 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.