Back

How neural network structure alters the brain's self-organized criticality

Sugimoto, Y. A.; Yadohisa, H.; Abe, M. S.

2024-09-24 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.24.614702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The brain criticality hypothesis has been a central research topic in theoretical neuroscience for two decades. This hypothesis suggests that the brain operates near the critical point at the boundary between order and disorder, where it acquires its information-processing capabilities. The mechanism that maintains this critical state has been proposed as a feedback system known as self-organized criticality (SOC); brain parameters, such as synaptic plasticity, are regulated internally without external adjustment. Therefore, clarifying how SOC occurs can help us to understand the mechanisms that maintain brain function and cause brain disorders. From the standpoint of neural network structures, the topology of neural circuits also plays a crucial role in information processing, with healthy neural networks exhibiting small-world, scale-free, and modular characteristics. However, how these network structures affect SOC remains poorly understood. In this study, we numerically investigated the possibility that the structure of neural networks contributes to the brains critical state and dysfunction using a mathematical model. Our results reveal that the time scales at which synaptic plasticity operates to achieve a critical state differ depending on the network structure. Additionally, we observed Dragon king phenomena associated with abnormal neural activity, depending on the network structure and synaptic plasticity time scales. Notably, Dragon king was observed over a wide range of synaptic plasticity time scales in scale-free networks with high-degree hub nodes. This study emphasizes the importance of neural network topology in neuroscience from the perspective of SOC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
2
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
3
Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
6
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
10
Cognitive Neurodynamics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
12
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Neural Networks
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
17
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
26
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Nonlinear Dynamics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%