Stroke recognition in medical emergency calls:A novel sensitivity definition as basis for developing AI decision support
Iversen, E.; Ihle-Hansen, H.; Halle, K. K.; Lundervold, A. S.; Myrmel, L.; Vestbo, A. S.; Fromm, A.; Autenried, C.; Brattebo, G.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe sensitivity of emergency medical communication centers (EMCC) for stroke detection varies widely. However, few studies offer detailed insights into the entirety of prehospital pathways in patients with stroke. Therefore, this study aimed to lay the foundation for artificial intelligence (AI) decision support tools in EMCCs by exploring their ability to detect strokes in medical emergency calls, describe a novel method for stroke sensitivity calculation in the EMCC, and identify factors associated with stroke recognition during a call. MethodsIn total, 1,164 patients with stroke in the catchment area of Bergen EMCC in 2018 and 2019 were included, and a dataset from the EMCC was established manually and linked with data from the Norwegian Stroke Registry (NSR) for analysis. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square test for categorical variables, Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and multivariate logistic regression (LR) were performed on data obtained from patients primarily assessed by EMCC (n=838). ResultsUsing a novel method, we found a stroke detection sensitivity of 76.8% in our study, compared to the 63.4% when using the traditional sensitivity detection method. LR analysis showed a positive association between stroke suspicion and ischemic strokes (odds ratio [OR]=0.317 [0.209-0.481]; p<0,001, with ischemic stroke as the reference) and wake-up strokes (OR=1.716 [1.110-2.653]; p=0.015). Among the NSR symptoms, only aphasia/dysarthria was positively associated with stroke suspicion (OR=1.600 [1.087-2.353]; p=0.017), while leg paresis (OR=0.609 [0.390-0.953]; p=0.009) and vertigo (OR=0.376 [0.204-0.694]; p=0.002) were negatively associated. ConclusionsThis study introduced a novel and more accurate method for calculating EMCC stroke sensitivity, which is relevant for developing decision support tools, such as AI. Moreover, we identified factors of particular interest for future EMCC research that are relevant to developing AI decision-support tools. Clinical trialshttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04648449
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 95%
- Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcomes after Reversal of Subtherapeutic Warfarin: Analysis of Data from GWTG-Stroke 95%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of the STANDING algorithm in patients with isolated vertigo/dizziness, a multicentre prospective study (STANDING-M) 92%
- The association between major trauma centre care and outcomes of adult patients injured by low falls in England and Wales 92%
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic cerebral autoregulation during and 3 months after endovascular treatment in large-vessel occlusion stroke 92%
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 92%
- Endovascular structures of the basilar artery: forms of the basilar nonfusion spectrum 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement of quality of stroke care with national electronic health records: a cohort during and after the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 93%
- Outcome Disparities by Insurance Plan and Educational Attainment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Machine Learning for Enhanced and Interpretable Risk Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care 94%
- Predicting factors for long-term survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest - a propensity score-matched analysis 93%
- Confounding adjustment performance of ordinal analysis methods in stroke studies 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.