Exploiting pleiotropy to enhance variant discovery with functional false discovery rates
Bass, A. J.; Wallace, C.
Show abstract
The cost of acquiring participants for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) can limit sample sizes and inhibit discovery of genetic variants. We introduce the surrogate functional false discovery rate (sfFDR) framework which integrates summary statistics of related traits to increase power. The sfFDR framework provides estimates of FDR quantities such as the functional local FDR and q-value, and uses these estimates to derive a functional p-value for type I error rate control and a functional local Bayes factor for post-GWAS analyses (e.g., fine mapping and colocalization). Compared to a standard analysis, sfFDR substantially increased power (equivalent to a 60% increase in sample size) in a study of obesity-related traits from the UK Biobank, and discovered eight additional lead SNPs near genes linked to immune-related responses in a rare disease GWAS of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Collectively, these results highlight the utility of exploiting related traits in both small and large studies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Welch-weighted Egger regression reduces false positives due to correlated pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization 98%
- Sparse modeling of interactions enables fast detection of genome-wide epistasis in biobank-scale studies 97%
- Fast and Accurate Bayesian Polygenic Risk Modeling with Variational Inference 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- SparsePro: an efficient fine-mapping method integrating summary statistics and functional annotations 98%
- Causal Inference for Heritable Phenotypic Risk Factors Using Heterogeneous Genetic Instruments 97%
- Leveraging expression from multiple tissues using sparse canonical correlation analysis (sCCA) and aggregate tests improves the power of transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- XMAP: Cross-population fine-mapping by leveraging genetic diversity and accounting for confounding bias 97%
- Simultaneous estimation of bi-directional causal effects and heritable confounding from GWAS summary statistics 97%
- SUMMIT: An integrative approach for better transcriptomic data imputation improves causal gene identification 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.