Back

Cross omics risk scores of inflammation markers are associated with all-cause mortality: The Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

Yaskolka Meir, A.; Yun, H.; Hu, J.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Bever, A.; Ratanatharathorn, A.; Song, M.; Eliassen, A. H.; Chibnik, L.; Koenen, K.; Pare, G.; Stampfer, M. J.; Liang, L.

2024-09-24 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.09.24.24313672 medRxiv
Show abstract

Inflammation is a critical component of chronic diseases, aging progression, and lifespan. Omics signatures may characterize inflammation status beyond blood biomarkers. We leveraged genetics (Polygenic-Risk-Score; PRS), metabolomics (Metabolomic-Risk-Score; MRS), and epigenetics (Epigenetic-Risk-Score; ERS) to build multi-omics-multi-marker risk scores for inflammation status represented by the level of circulating C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa). We found that multi-omics risk-scores generally outperformed single-omics risk scores in prediction of all-cause mortality in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Compared with circulating inflammation biomarkers, some multi-omics risk scores had a higher HR for all cause-mortality when including both score and circulating IL6 in the same model (1-SD IL6 MRS-ERS: HR=1.77 [1.15-2.72] vs. 1-SD circulating IL6 HR=1.11 [0.75,1.66]; 1-SD IL6 PRS-MRS: HR=1.32 [1.21,1.45] vs. 1-SD circulating IL6 HR=1.31 [1.12, 1.53]; 1-SD PRS-MRS-ERS: HR=1.62 [1.04, 2.53] vs. 1-SD circulating IL6: HR=1.16 [0.77, 1.74]). In the Nurses Health Study (NHS), NHS II, and Health Professional Follow-up Study with available omics, 1-SD of IL6 PRS and 1-SD IL6 PRS-MRS had HR=1.13 [1.00,1.27] and HR=1.13 [1.01,1.27], among individuals >65years without mutual adjustment of the score and circulating IL6. Our study demonstrated that some multi-omics scores for inflammation markers may characterize important inflammation burden for an individual beyond those represented by blood biomarkers and improve our prediction capability for aging process and lifespan.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.