Discovery of dehydroamino acids and their crosslinks in Tau and other aggregating proteins of Alzheimers disease
Markovich, S. W.; Frey, B. L.; Scalf, M.; Shortreed, M. R.; Smith, L. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlzheimers disease (AD) is characterized by accumulation of two types of protein aggregates, senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, which strongly contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Senile plaques consist primarily of aggregated amyloid-{beta}, while neurofibrillary tangles form via aggregation of the protein Tau, as well as other microtubule-associated proteins such as CRMP2. Posttranslational modifications have been hypothesized to contribute to the initial aggregation events that lead to SPs and NFTs. Dehydroamino acids (DHAAs) are posttranslational modifications rarely observed in humans and have not previously been reported in AD. DHAAs arise from the eliminylation of serine, threonine, or cysteine, yielding a double bond with distinct molecular geometry and reactivity. Their geometry can produce secondary structure rearrangements, such as those seen in senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle formation, while their reactivity can cause intramolecular or intermolecular (protein-protein) crosslinking. We hypothesized that this modification might be present in protein aggregation-associated neurodegenerative disorders like AD. MethodsWe performed mass spectrometry-based bottom-up proteomics on the sarkosyl-insoluble (protein aggregate-enriched) material from ten AD brains and three age-matched controls. Identifications of DHAA-mediated crosslinked peptides were validated using both an isotopic labeling strategy and spike-in experiments employing synthetic crosslinked peptide standards. Similar findings were obtained in searches of publicly available proteomic datasets from AD and control brains. ResultsWe identified 412 sites of DHAA modification in 184 proteins, with the highest prevalence in the neurofibrillary tangle-forming proteins Tau and CRMP2. Comparison with results of previous protein aggregate interactomics studies show that proteins containing the DHAA modification are more highly associated with protein aggregates than are proteins containing any other individual posttranslational modification. We further observed 11 protein crosslinks arising from DHAAs, including three from the Tau protein. Label free quantification showed that Tau crosslinks are an order of magnitude more prevalent in AD samples than in age-matched controls. ConclusionsDehydroamino acids and their derivatives are prevalent modifications in the Alzheimers disease brain proteome. These modifications give rise to protein crosslinks which may contribute to protein aggregation processes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Inclusion bodies formed by polyglutamine and poly(glycine-alanine) are enriched with distinct proteomes but converge in proteins that are risk factors for disease and involved in protein degradation 94%
- An immuno-enrichment free, validated quantification of tau protein in human CSF by LC-MS/MS 93%
- Tau protein aggregation associated with SARS-CoV-2 main protease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electron-Activated Dissociation and Collision-Induced Dissociation Glycopeptide Fragmentation for Improved Glycoproteomics 94%
- In Vivo Large Scale Mapping Of Protein Turnover In The Human Cerebrospinal Fluid 94%
- Parallelization with Dual-Trap Single-Column Configuration Maximizes Throughput of Proteomic Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dual-Probe Activity-Based Protein Profiling Reveals Site-Specific Differences in Protein Binding of EGFR-Directed Drugs 94%
- In vivo prenylomic profiling in the brain of a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease reveals increased prenylation of a key set of proteins 94%
- Photoredox-catalyzed decarboxylative C-terminal differentiation for bulk and single molecule proteomics 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.