Back

Bnip3lb-driven mitophagy sustains expansion of the embryonic hematopoietic stem cell pool

Meader, E.; Walcheck, M. T.; Leder, M. R.; Jing, R.; Wrighton, P. J.; Sugden, W. W.; Najia, M. A.; Oderberg, I. M.; Taylor, V. M.; LeBlanc, Z. C.; Quenzer, E. D.; Lim, S.-E.; Daley, G. Q.; Goessling, W.; North, T. E.

2024-09-23 cell biology
10.1101/2024.09.23.614531 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Embryonic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) have the unique ability to undergo rapid proliferation while maintaining multipotency, a clinically-valuable quality which currently cannot be replicated in vitro. Here, we show that embryonic HSPCs achieve this state by precise spatio-temporal regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) via Bnip3lb-associated developmentally-programmed mitophagy, a distinct autophagic regulatory mechanism from that of adult HSPCs. While ROS drives HSPC specification in the dorsal aorta, scRNAseq and live-imaging of Tg(ubi:mitoQC) zebrafish indicate that mitophagy initiates as HSPCs undergo endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition and colonize the caudal hematopoietic tissue (CHT). Knockdown of bnip3lb reduced mitophagy and HSPC numbers in the CHT by promoting myeloid-biased differentiation and apoptosis, which was rescued by anti-oxidant exposure. Conversely, induction of mitophagy enhanced both embryonic HSPC and lymphoid progenitor numbers. Significantly, mitophagy activation improved ex vivo functional capacity of hematopoietic progenitors derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs), enhancing serial-replating hematopoietic colony forming potential. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIROS promotes HSPC formation in the dorsal aorta but negatively affects maintenance thereafter. C_LIO_LIHSPCs colonizing secondary niches control ROS levels via Bnip3lb-directed mitophagy. C_LIO_LIMitophagy protects nascent HSPCs from ROS-associated apoptosis and maintains multipotency. C_LIO_LIInduction of mitophagy enhances long-term hematopoietic potential of iPSC-derived HSPCs. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.1%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
5
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.0%
7
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
8
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 33%
2.6%
10
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
13
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
16
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Cell Research
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
Nature Immunology
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
25
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
27
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%