Mammalian promoters are characterised by low occupancy and high turnover of RNA polymerase II
Chatsirisupachai, K.; Moene, C. J. I.; Kleinendorst, R.; Kreibich, E.; Molina, N.; Krebs, A.
Show abstract
The general transcription machinery and its occupancy at promoters are highly conserved across metazoans. This contrasts with the kinetics of mRNA production that considerably differ between model species such as Drosophila and mouse. The molecular basis for these kinetic differences is currently unknown. Here, we used Single Molecule Footprinting to measure RNA Polymerase II (Pol II) occupancy, the fraction of DNA molecules bound, at promoters in mouse and Drosophila cell lines. Single molecule data reveals that Pol II occupancy is on average 3-5 times more frequent at transcriptionally active Drosophila promoters than active mouse promoters. Kinetic modelling of the occupancy states suggests that these differences in Pol II occupancy are determined by the ratio between the transcription initiation and Pol II turnover rates. We used chemical perturbation of transcription initiation to determine Pol II turnover rate in both species. Integration of these data into the model shows that infrequent Pol II occupancy in mammals is explained by the combination of high Pol II turnover and low transcription initiation rates.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA polymerase epsilon is a central coordinator of heterochromatin structure and function in Arabidopsis 96%
- CpG island turnover events predict evolutionary changes in enhancer activity 96%
- Mapping and modeling the genomic basis of differential RNA isoform expression at single-cell resolution with LR-Split-seq 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.