Back

Effects of sensorimotor delays and muscle force capacity limits on the performance of feedforward and feedback control in animals of different sizes

Mohamed Thangal, S. N.; More, H. L.; Remy, C. D.; Donelan, M.

2024-09-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2024.09.23.614404 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animals rely on both feedforward and feedback control for perturbation responses. When comparing animals of different sizes, we find that several features that affect perturbation responses change--larger animals have longer sensorimotor time delays, heavier body segments and proportionally weaker muscles. We used simple computational models to compare fast perturbation response times under feedforward and feedback control, as a function of animal size. We developed two tasks representing common perturbation response scenarios in animal locomotion: a distributed mass pendulum approximating swing limb repositioning (swing task), and an inverted pendulum approximating whole body posture recovery (posture task). First, we used a normalized feedback control system to show how feedback response times can either be limited by the force generation capacity of muscles (force-limited), or by sensorimotor delays which constrain the maximum feedback gains that can be used to produce stable responses (delay-limited). Next, we used more detailed scaled models which represent the full-size range of terrestrial mammals and parameterized the sensorimotor delays, maximum muscle forces, and inertial properties using published scaling relationships from literature. Across animal size and in both tasks, we found that feedback control was primarily delay-limited--the fastest responses used a fraction of the available muscle force capacity. Feedforward control, which is able to fully activate muscles and produce faster responses--was about four times faster than feedback control in the smallest animals, and around two times faster in the largest animals. For rapid perturbation responses, feedback control appears ineffective for terrestrial mammals of all sizes, as the fastest response times exceeded available movement times, while feedforward control did not. Thus, feedforward control is more effective for reacting quickly to sudden and large perturbations in animals of all sizes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
19.1%
2
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
3
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
11
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
Integrative Organismal Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%