Back

DrugOn: A Comprehensive Drug Ontology for Precision Oncology

Kornrumpf, K.; Gnass, V.; Holm, M.; Beissbarth, T.; Koch, R.; Dönitz, J.

2024-09-24 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.1101/2024.09.23.24314201 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPrecision oncology and biomedical cancer research increasingly rely on tools to select optimal drugs targeting specific genetic alterations in cancer. A major challenge for bioinformatic tools supporting drug selection is to standardize different annotations (substance, drug name, drug class) to a common level, typically the drug class. While manual classification is time-consuming and potentially biased, existing resources often lack completeness, granularity, or mix up drug classes and drug targets. A structured, automatically built drug ontology such as DrugOn fills these gaps, improving decision support and data-driven research. MethodsDrugOn integrates information from multiple sources to create a comprehensive drug ontology. It includes categories, molecular targets and additional annotations from DrugBank, ATC, MesH, KEGG and ClueIO. The combination of this data enables accurate identification of drug categories for each drug. ResultsDrugOns effectiveness was demonstrated by classifying 336 drugs from CIViC. It agreed with manually curated database-derived classifications for 268 out of 282 drugs assessed in translational lymphoma research. In 54 cases, classification was not possible due to data gaps. DrugOn provides a REST API and a front-end application for ontology exploration and automated drug queries. ConclusionDrugOn, a unified drug ontology, is derived from public datasets and refined by precise processing rules to ensure a reliable, updatable resource for drug information, in precision medicine. It uniquely categorizes drug classes and target proteins, and its structured format, complemented by an accessible API, allows for easy integration into data driven pipelines. Initially tailored for lymphoma research, DrugOns adaptable nature supports broader cancer research applications and potential data source expansions. DrugOn is accessible at https://mtb.bioinf.med.uni-goettingen.de/drugon-web.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.