Bridging the gap between the connectome and whole-brain activity in C. elegans
Creamer, M. S.; Leifer, A. M.; Pillow, J. W.
Show abstract
A fundamental goal of neuroscience is to understand how anatomy determines the functional properties of the nervous system. However, previous work has failed to show how the functional connections between neurons are derived from the connectome in the nematode C. elegans, raising questions about the extent to which anatomy is informative of signaling1-3. Here, we address this problem using a connectome-constrained dynamical model of the brain, which we fit to whole-brain recordings of neural activity during optogenetic perturbation of single neurons2. This dynamical model, which contains non-zero weights only between anatomically connected neurons, captured causal interactions between all pairs of neurons 92% as well as the reproducibility of the perturbation data themselves. This included interactions between anatomically unconnected neurons, which the model accounted for in terms of signal propagation over paths that include multiple neurons. Strikingly, alternative models fit using a shuffled connectome achieved much lower performance. Finally, we found that adding connections beyond those in the connectome did not improve the models ability to capture causal interactions. Our dynamical model thus provides the strongest link yet between the connectivity of the C. elegans nervous system and its causal interactions and provides a blueprint for exploring the link between structure and function in other organisms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural assemblies uncovered by generative modeling explain whole-brain activity statistics and reflect structural connectivity 97%
- Single spikes drive sequential propagation and routing of activity in a cortical network 97%
- Remapping in a recurrent neural network model of navigation and context inference 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.