Back

Molecular and Proteomic Profiles of Radioiodine Refractory Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Liu, H.; Wang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Hu, P.; Li, L.; Yang, D.; Kong, D.; Xu, Z.; Sun, Y.; Chen, C.

2024-12-12 oncology
10.1101/2024.09.22.24314143 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite the generally favorable prognosis of papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) following surgery with/without radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy, approximately one-third of patients experiencing recurrence and metastasis eventually develop resistance to RAI, leading to poor outcomes. However, the mechanisms underlying RAI-refractoriness remain elusive. This study aimed to assess the molecular and proteomic characteristics of RAI-refractory PTC (RR-PTC) for deeper insights. MethodsThe medical records were reviewed for the selection and grouping of RR-PTC patients and RAI-sensitive controls. RR-PTC patients were divided into three subgroups: continuous RAI uptake (ID), loss of uptake at the first I-131 treatment (iDF) and lost gradually (iDG). Proteomic profiling and targeted next-generation sequencing were performed on primary lesions. The incidence of gene mutations and fusions was compared across groups. Bioinformatic analysis was subsequently conducted to identify the differentially expressed proteins and enriched pathways. ResultsForty-eight PTC patients with recurrence and/or metastasis were included. The expression profiles of the RR-PTC and control groups were similar. In the subgroup comparison, enriched pathways related to MAPK and TNF signaling were associated with negative I-131 uptake and tumor tolerance with positive I-131 uptake. The BRAFV600E mutation was less common in the ID group, whereas the TERT promoter mutation was more common in the iDF group. NCOA4-RET fusion was more common in the ID group. ConclusionThe present study constructed the first proteomic profile of RR-PTC. The identified proteins and pathways may be promising biomarkers and drug targets. Gene alterations can aid in the early diagnosis of RR-PTC.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.