Back

Covariation between metabolic and radioactive dose rates in Chornobyl rodents

Boratynski, Z.; Lavrinienko, A.; Lehmann, P.; Mousseau, T. A.; Tukalenko, E.; Vasylenko, A.; Watts, P. C.; Mappes, T.; Nowick, K.

2024-09-24 ecology
10.1101/2024.09.20.614164 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High metabolic rate may provide fitness benefits for individuals. But high metabolic rates incur energetic costs and the need to ingest more food, increasing the risks of ingesting harmful substances from the environment. How organisms respond to elevated levels of ionizing radiation is an important question in the light of increasing pollution from nuclear accidents and waste, as well as ever-increasing reliance on radiation in medical diagnostics and therapies. We investigated how limits to metabolic rate, and aerobic metabolic scope (ceiling of energetic activity above maintenance levels), of wild rodents inhabiting a gradient of radioactive contamination from the Chernobyl accident covary with the biological burden of radionuclides in their bodies. Our results demonstrate that high biological dose rate correlates with high self-maintenance and low aerobic capacity in adults. In contrast, in subadults high dose rate correlates with high aerobic capacity. Consequently, high dose rate correlates with low aerobic scope in adults, but with high aerobic scope in subadults. Despite the uncertainty of the causal mechanisms, whether the dose rate affects the metabolic rate, the reverse or the reciprocal feedback prevail, it can be hypothesized that metabolic down-regulation could contribute to protection against radioactive exposure. Yet, metabolic down-regulation might be constrained by developmental obligations. Understanding the physiological mechanisms affecting responses to radiation exposure is key for risk assessment of environmental contamination, radiotherapies, and space exploration, and may help to rectify discordant opinions concerning the effects of radiation on the ecology of organisms living in Chornobyl.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
2
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.3%
4
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
8
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
10
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.3%
11
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
14
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
15
Environmental Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
20
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
22
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
24
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Epigenetics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%