Back

CAR Treg synergy with anti-CD154 mediates infectious tolerance to dictate heart transplant outcomes.

Durgam, S. S.; Rosado sanchez, I.; Yin, D.; Speck, M.; Mojibian, M.; Sayin, I.; Hynes, G.; Alegre, M.-L.; Levings, M. K.; Chong, A. S.

2024-10-28 immunology
10.1101/2024.09.20.614149 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Successful allograft specific tolerance induction would eliminate the need for daily immunosuppression and improve post-transplant quality of life. Adoptive cell therapy with regulatory T cells expressing donor-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR-Tregs) is a promising strategy, but as monotherapy, cannot prolong the survival with allografts with multiple MHC mismatches. Using an HLA-A2-transgenic haplo-mismatched heart transplantation model in immunocompetent C57Bl/6 recipients, we show that HLA-A2-specific (A2) CAR Tregs was able to synergize with low dose of anti-CD154 to enhance graft survival. Using haplo-mismatched grafts expressing the 2W-OVA transgene and tetramer-based tracking of 2W- and OVA-specific T cells, we showed that in mice with accepted grafts, A2.CAR Tregs inhibited endogenous non-A2 donor- specific T cell, B cell and antibody responses, and promoted a significant increase in endogenous FoxP3+Tregs with indirect donor-specificity. By contrast, in mice where A2.CAR Tregs failed to prolong graft survival, FoxP3neg A2.CAR T cells preferentially accumulated in rejecting allografts and endogenous donor-specific responses were not controlled. This study therefore provides the first evidence for synergy between A2.CAR Tregs and CD154 blockade to promote infectious tolerance in immunocompetent recipients of haplo-mismatched heart grafts and defines features of A2.CAR Tregs when they fail to reshape host immunity towards allograft tolerance.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.